Thanks for your PR, @egans146!

It's something I also noticed but since it's technically a breaking change, I wasn't sure if it was the right thing to do.

Since you decided to send a PR, I guess the existing logic (i.e returning the bot+user claims unflatten) is not ideal. On the other hand, if we do that, the bot claims will no longer be returned. A middle ground could be to flatten the user claims and still include a bot claims node as we do for some of the other providers. What do you think?

Thank you for taking the time to respond.

I think your proposal would be a good middle ground. I may have initially rushed and failed to consider the other nodes that would no longer be returned.

You think the « bot » node nested in « application » should be included or the whole application node ?